| Funmatch vs UI | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Funmatch vs UI Mon 08 Feb 2010, 00:23 | |
| Our cb match was moved because 1 player of them was missing. Thats why Execute and me played 1 ctf match vs UI, because their opponents werent there too. |
|
| |
<DARK~GolaN> Administrator
Number of posts : 571 Age : 37 Location : Germany Registration date : 2009-07-25
| Subject: Re: Funmatch vs UI Mon 08 Feb 2010, 00:26 | |
| yo not bad | |
|
| |
Ork mega kill
Number of posts : 109 Age : 34 Location : Netherlands Registration date : 2009-10-22
| Subject: Re: Funmatch vs UI Mon 08 Feb 2010, 01:23 | |
| nice all | |
|
| |
neji multi kill
Number of posts : 69 Registration date : 2009-08-24
| Subject: Re: Funmatch vs UI Tue 09 Feb 2010, 00:36 | |
| GG still dont understand why someone put barn as ctf map... | |
|
| |
<DARK~GolaN> Administrator
Number of posts : 571 Age : 37 Location : Germany Registration date : 2009-07-25
| Subject: Re: Funmatch vs UI Tue 09 Feb 2010, 00:37 | |
| I should answer this. because barn is the map that makes most fun to play maybe? | |
|
| |
neji multi kill
Number of posts : 69 Registration date : 2009-08-24
| Subject: Re: Funmatch vs UI Wed 10 Feb 2010, 13:20 | |
| you say this cuz you dunno what ctf is... | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Funmatch vs UI Thu 11 Feb 2010, 00:59 | |
| ork and me played another :) |
|
| |
<DARK~GolaN> Administrator
Number of posts : 571 Age : 37 Location : Germany Registration date : 2009-07-25
| Subject: Re: Funmatch vs UI Thu 11 Feb 2010, 17:06 | |
| - neji wrote:
- you say this cuz you dunno what ctf is...
ctf = capture the fag or? u have a bad taste of maps, thats it. | |
|
| |
Ork mega kill
Number of posts : 109 Age : 34 Location : Netherlands Registration date : 2009-10-22
| Subject: Re: Funmatch vs UI Thu 11 Feb 2010, 18:28 | |
| gg dude, only i could play better i was kinda distracted | |
|
| |
neji multi kill
Number of posts : 69 Registration date : 2009-08-24
| Subject: Re: Funmatch vs UI Thu 11 Feb 2010, 19:33 | |
| lol golan. nothing more to say GG anyway | |
|
| |
Éxéçúté[est] mega kill
Number of posts : 127 Age : 40 Location : on spec :P Registration date : 2009-10-15
| Subject: Re: Funmatch vs UI Fri 12 Feb 2010, 00:28 | |
| Good job guys. DARK rocks | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Funmatch vs UI Sat 13 Feb 2010, 02:18 | |
| agreed capture the fag. come to br, assrape one after the other. neji u would like it too. |
|
| |
neji multi kill
Number of posts : 69 Registration date : 2009-08-24
| Subject: Re: Funmatch vs UI Sat 13 Feb 2010, 04:27 | |
| dunno if it is ironic or not xaero i dont like assrape anyway and i dont like br either \o/ | |
|
| |
KYo mega kill
Number of posts : 115 Age : 34 Location : USA Registration date : 2008-08-25
| Subject: Re: Funmatch vs UI Sat 13 Feb 2010, 08:00 | |
| from a guy who plays CTF for 7 years.
CTF is pure tactics teamplay on 2k4 basecamping..not CTF, CTF has always been getting clean flags out with good cover since 2k4 most ppl just learned basecamping on pubs and try it in wars and fail.
and from my little iBR experience i was there when flarized was intoduced to iBR then equlibrium made darkbalance since then ppl prefer most fragmaps...its odd that I was on the team that introduced fragmaps ...barn...flarized..and darkbalance lol | |
|
| |
neji multi kill
Number of posts : 69 Registration date : 2009-08-24
| Subject: Re: Funmatch vs UI Sat 13 Feb 2010, 14:11 | |
| | |
|
| |
E.Y.E holy sh!t
Number of posts : 1224 Age : 37 Location : belgium ghent Registration date : 2004-12-23
| Subject: Re: Funmatch vs UI Tue 16 Feb 2010, 17:20 | |
| i prefer tactic maps on iCTF, very nice maps to play on a good way in iCTF!! really cool!!
used to love it, in iBR on the other hand i used to be a PRO raper on fragging, but also prefer anubis of course! | |
|
| |
Tomasz double kill
Number of posts : 29 Age : 30 Location : Warsaw Registration date : 2009-12-14
| Subject: Re: Funmatch vs UI Wed 24 Feb 2010, 23:24 | |
| | |
|
| |
<DARK~Vader> mega kill
Number of posts : 193 Age : 32 Location : next to xae Registration date : 2009-11-08
| Subject: Re: Funmatch vs UI Thu 25 Feb 2010, 00:12 | |
| | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Funmatch vs UI | |
| |
|
| |
| Funmatch vs UI | |
|